Letter: When there were no nuclear secrets to tell
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.YOUR report, 'Rothschild 'spied as the Fifth Man' ' (23 October), has some disputable, if not misleading assertions, which are germane to the argument about the identity of the Fifth Man.
Your reporter David Leitch says that a new book, The Fifth Man by Roland Perry, claims that Lord (Victor) Rothschild 'first alerted Stalin to Allied plans to build an atom bomb using Plutonium 235'. Perry alleges that Rothschild passed on to Russian intelligence early details (1943) on the plutonium bomb. Mr Leitch seems to have confused this with the bomb which used Uranium atom 235 as its fuel. This was more difficult to collect, and came later.
Perry mounts parts of his case on the claim that Rothschild was first to pass on data on the plutonium bomb being developed at Professor G P Thompson's laboratory at Imperial College. Certainly, this would have put him ahead of that other KGB spy, Klaus Fuchs, who was labouring with limited success on the U235 route at Sir Mark Oliphant's laboratories at Birmingham University. Fuchs had little success until he joined the Manhattan Project at Los Alamos in the United States, late in 1944.
Mr Leitch further writes that the KGB were grateful to John Cairncross, the Treasury spy, for 'atom secrets'. In his book KGB, Christopher Andrew gives 'probable' credit to Cairncross, in the summer of 1941, for telling the Russians that there was a joint Anglo-American decision to build an atomic bomb. This hardly amounted to 'atom secrets'. At that time, there were quite simply no great technical secrets to tell. The efforts to create such a weapon had not yet begun.
Richard Joslin London SW18
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments