Letter:What Gott really stood for
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NEAL Ascherson's open letter to Richard Gott seems rather to miss the point ("When the spooks get a grip", 11 December). If he were just another journalist his involvement with the KGB would be of no importance. After all, other journalists sell t hemselves to the CIA or, even worse, to Rupert Murdoch.
The issue is that Richard Gott stood, and to an extent still stands, for a socialism which did not bow down to one master or another. This is surely what the Guardian's editor Peter Preston meant when he said that Gott was a "free spirit". The problem isthat Gott clearly had illusions in the tyranny that was Stalinism. And if there is one thing that the left does not need it is illusions.
Keith Flett London N17
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments