Letter: Watchdog is wise to problems of the CSA
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.You report that the Child Support Agency says its problems are almost over ("Fathers cough up as CSA improves", 27 October). A look at this week's annual report from the CSA's independent watchdog tells a different story.
The chief child support officer's report took a random sample of 610 maintenance decisions and analysed them to see if the assessments were correct and the proper procedure followed.
The assessment was completely wrong in 179 cases (29 per cent). The amount assessed and the procedure were both correct in 205 cases (34 per cent). In a further 115 cases (19 per cent), irregularities and maladministration were found, even when the end figure was right. There was insufficient information to judge if the assessment was right in 101 cases (16 per cent). The remaining 2 per cent were cases where no assessment was made. In short, one third of assessments were wrong, one third were only right by chance (or couldn't be evaluated), leaving one third correct.
The chief child support officer said: "It was disappointing to note increases in the number of MAs which were incorrect." So much for the CSA's glad tidings.
Andy Farquarson
Broadwell, Warks
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments