Letter: Thrill of science is not enough
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The article "The end of science? No, the beginning" (4 May) stirred the imagination. In science knowledge is gained from experiment and observation while imagination links unrelated situations. But it is required that every imaginative leap must provide predictions capable of being verified, or rejected, by appropriate measurements. And there must be more than one prediction if a theory is to be valid. Not all the matters developed in the article conform to these requirements. There would seem to be no possibility, for example, of peering into a black hole to see if it contains the seed of another Universe. Whether or not there are other Universes would seem also to be beyond verification. Let the skin tingle if it gives pleasure, but it remains speculation unless the consequences can be verified.
G H A Cole
Professor of Engineering Physics
University of Hull
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments