Letter: There are more ways to vote than Roy Hattersley thinks
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Roy Hattersley seems to think that the only alternative to one party in government with an overall majority is a coalition. Why? Even if that were so, it is very unlikely that the junior partner would hold out for most of its policies if the senior partner didn't like them. A far more likely scenario is that the junior partner would agree to support elements of the senior partner's programme in exchange for parts of its own. Neither could insist on a policy the other found unconscionable. The negotiations would be informed by the relative risks to each partner of a collapse of the coalition and its likely fate in the subsequent general election.
If we had had proportional representation in 1992 it is likely that Mr Hattersley would now be a senior minister under Prime Minister Kinnock. No doubt there would be some things that they wouldn't have been able to do owing to Liberal Democrat opposition, but they would have been able to achieve a great deal more than Labour has managed in the intervening years. Isn't 75 per cent of a Labour loaf better than the Conservative rations of the last five years?
Mrs Thatcher had a "mandate" to lay waste to our industrial capacity, throwing millions out of work, and to introduce the poll tax. I don't regard that as a good argument for allowing a party opposed by four voters out of seven to gain an absolute majority of seats in Parliament.
Simon Gazeley
Bath, Avon
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments