Letter: There are more ways to vote than Roy Hattersley thinks

W. R. Efford
Sunday 16 March 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Roy Hattersley does find room in his article to consider the systems in Germany and Eire and for some elections in Australia. In the case of Eire the voters have substantially rejected attempts to change from their STV system in two referendums. Objections to STV come predominantly from politicians in Eire who feel their electorate have too much choice both across and within party boundaries and in their own favoured party can express a preference for a candidate who is not the party bosses' first choice.

The result? There are no safe seats. Is this what Mr Hattersley fears?

W R Elford

Bath, Avon

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in