Letter: The poor sex

Josie Edwards
Sunday 10 November 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In your piece on growing wage inequality, you list the best ways to get rich ("How fat cats rock the boat", Review, 3 November). You left out the most important one - be a man.

Women earn less than men for the following reasons: formerly male jobs now done by women, such as building society manager and factory supervisor, have been downgraded. The responsibility levels are the same or greater: the pay and conditions worse.

Second, subjective judgements about value mean that women's jobs are considered worth less than men's. This not only applies to feminised careers such as teaching or nursing, but to "women's" jobs in "male" industries. Commercial law pays more than family law, for example.

This gap has been widened by the growth of merit- and bonus-based pay. In its excellent report for the Equal Opportunities Commission the Institute of Manpower Studies details how women's skills are denigrated and how, when discretionary bonuses enter the equation, women are judged much less favourably than men.

There is no objective market in wages, just relentless economic sexism.

Josie Edwards

London N10

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in