Letter: The ghost of Marx laid to rest
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
NEAL ASCHERSON ('An urbane spectre', 15 May) chides Karl Marx for not being 'accurate' when he wrote in 1848 that 'the spectre of Communism is haunting Europe'. However, Marx was referring to primitive communism which had existed before social systems based on class relations. Capitalism, the last class system, had brought the forces of production to a point where a more developed communism was possible. Thus the literary use of 'haunting'.
Finally, Marx would not have recognised the political parties now coming to power in Eastern Europe as communist. Nor would he have seen anything socialist in the tyrannies which preceded them. Descendants of Marx they are not.
Communism and socialism (they meant the same thing for Marx) mean the abolition of the wages/salary system; no buying or selling and the absence of a coercive state. This core doctrine was rejected by Lenin and those who followed him.
Richard Lloyd
North Watford, Herts
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments