Letter: System where dissent survives

David C. Lane
Saturday 14 May 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

P D SOMERVILLE juxtaposes a preference for work published in scientific journals over views of individual experts with the Spanish Inquisition tyranny over Galileo (Letters, 8 May).

The purpose of peer refereeing is not to eradicate dissent. Primarily, it is to ensure that published work has employed a recognised methodology and that it builds upon previous work. However, departures from either criteria are accepted as long as they are recognised and justified as such and are advocated in a way which responds to previous work.

The intent is to enable researchers to advance knowledge in a tentative and communal way.

This is not to suggest that intellectual cliques do not develop. However, in such difficult cases, two or three referees, a journal editor and the entire editorial board may be called upon. This is not a perfect system, but the evolution of scientific knowledge is accepted as being a subtle and delicate social process, a balance between the momentum of currently held ideas and the refreshing disturbances of new ones.

David C Lane

City University

Business School

London EC2

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in