letter: Superband tax threatens historic buildings

Henry Law
Saturday 28 June 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

You report town hall and Whitehall suggestions for a council tax "superband" for properties worth over pounds 500,000 ("Are you a member of a growing superband?", 22 June).

The concept of a banded property tax was always a bad idea. It is rough justice and there were well over a million appeals against the initial valuations. To introduce a superband, even as an interim measure, would only compound the problem and could provoke the kind of "constructive vandalism" - partial demolition - adopted as a means of avoiding liability under the business rate. This would be particularly serious because many higher-value houses are historic buildings.

There is no really satisfactory interim remedy for the deficiencies of the council tax and thorough-going reform is needed. The fairest and most practical solution would be to shift to assessments based on site values - the annual rental value of the land. This is the simplest system to administer and does not penalise development or improvement - a major drawback of the council tax, the uniform business rate and the old rating system; if the owner of a shed replaces it with a well-appointed modern building, the reward is higher tax bills.

Henry Law

Brighton, East Sussex

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in