Letter: Shell should stop extracting fossil fuels and look for sustainable alternatives
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Whilst I agree with Anita Roddick that the best thing for the forests and indigenous people in Amazonian Peru would be not to extract gas there at all, there is another important side to this (16 February). If environmentalists drive out a company like Shell that will take the environment seriously it is highly likely that someone else will step in and take over. This has certainly happened in the case of petroleum and gas in Ecuador. When some of the multinationals pulled out, local companies with much less concern for the environment came in.
We should try to work with the more responsible companies like Shell and try to influence their environmental policies. In the long-run this is far more likely to preserve both the forest and the peoples of Amazonian Peru.
Prof Sir Ghillean Prance
Royal Botanic Gardens Kew
Richmond, Surrey
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments