Letter: 'Shamateurism' in rugby
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.STEVE PILGRIM'S one-year ban from playing rugby union is a typical example of the double standards employed by the game's administrators ('An exile back on home ground', Sport, 28 August).
On the one hand it is deemed acceptable for top union players to be given new jobs, homes, cars and 'expenses'. Yet it is unacceptable for a rugby union player to play rugby league, whether or not he receives payment. Meanwhile there is no bar on other professional sportsmen (footballers, golfers) playing rugby union.
It is not surprising that the Wasps' leading players hold no prejudice against Steve Pilgrim. Most players recognise 'shamateurism' for what it is, and it is only the fear of vindictive reprisals that prevents them from naming names.
Paul Foster
London SW19
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments