Letter: Selling the right to know

Maurice Frankel
Saturday 28 September 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

You report that a software company cannot afford to market a program containing food nutritional data because the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food has given exclusive rights to the data to the Royal Society of Chemistry ("Dieters pay as calorie counting is privatised", 22 September).

This should come as no surprise: the Government has long encouraged departments to market information. Indeed, DTI guidelines on "tradeable information" state: "information properties ... are only 'tradeable' if someone else wants them" - information will be made freely available to the public only so long as no one asks for it. As soon as there is a demand, a price can be attached. The 1994 "open government" code of practice offers no safeguard. It does not apply to information "provided as part of an existing charged service".

Departments are told not to introduce their own information service on an "uncommercial basis" where a similar service is provided electronically by the private sector. They are also warned against licensing the same data to more than one company with a particular market - as this "may allow no one to create real returns". The Government's approach is clear: information is a commodity which can be bought and sold like any other.

Maurice Frankel

Campaign for Freedom of Information, London EC1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in