LETTER : Paine's law
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NO LINK exists between Tom Paine's espousal of "education vouchers" in Rights of Man Part 2 and contemporary New Right ideologues such as Milton Friedman ("Vouchers rise from deathbed", 7 May).
In fact, Paine did not advocate "education vouchers" but direct lump sum transfer payments for relief of poor families' "distress" in rearing children (to the age of 14) and looking after the aged. Parents would be "enjoined" to send children to school for improving apprenticeship prospects. The payments, corresponding with the poor's remission from consumption taxes and replacement of the poor law (at a more generous rate), would largely be funded by culling patronage state bureaucracy and progressive property ("primogeniture") taxation of the wealthy.
This kind of progressive wealth redistribution and levelling would not be supported by the contemporary New Right.
Chris Lamb
Midsomer Norton, Bath
Bath.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments