Letter: Not the origin of the species
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BRIAN CATHCART quite rightly argues that Piltdown Man fooled so many for so long because it fitted then current beliefs about hominid evolution ('Everybody fell for Mr Piltdown' 22 May). But to claim that Piltdown Man 'fitted Darwinian theory to perfection' is misleading. Rather, Piltdown Man made 'sense' because it fitted an incorrect picture of evolution where 'missing links' were expected to bridge the gap between 'primitive' apes and 'advanced man'. Piltdown's skull housed a large brain and it was not understood then that bipedalism evolved before large brains. Mr Piltdown remains a classic example of the interdependence of data and ideas, and the people who use the latter to make sense of the former.
Frederic Vallee
St Albans, Herts
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments