Letter: No small dose
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Dr Wilkinson of the British Nuclear Industry Forum states that the increase in radioactive discharge that BNFL has applied to release from Sellafield of 0.4 per cent is only the equivalent to the dosage received by spending 45 minutes in an aircraft (Letters, 11 May). From these figures a simple calculation shows that BNFL is already authorised to discharge a dose equivalent to 187.5 hours in the high-flying aeroplane. Quite a lengthy flight - over a week in fact. More the sort of risk an astronaut might take than a member of the fare-paying public.
There is no "safe" level for radioactivity. Any increase carries an increased risk of extra deaths from cancer.
Anthony Cain
Llanberis, Gwynedd
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments