Letter: Most architects just want to make you happy

Maggie Mullan
Saturday 16 August 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I was concerned by Jeff Howell's account of architects ("Doctor on the House", Travel and Money, 10 August). Very few architects neglect their clients' wishes and requirements in the vain search for monumentality. The architect's role is to facilitate choice - to propose solutions to specific design problems. The decision on whether a particular design solution is to proceed should always lie with the client.

As for the claim that some architects "want to build monuments to themselves rather than work sympathetically with existing building", should we restrict ourselves and our clients to the production of fifth-rate pastiche in order to pander to a cultural deficiency that extols an ignorant nostalgia at the expense of confidence in our own age and the future? I think not. Conservation is one issue: the slavish reproduction of an iconography of a bygone age, regardless of quality, is another matter entirely.

I would be grateful if Mr Howell would point me (and my colleagues) in the direction of the "hefty fees" he mentions. A recent survey on salaries puts architects at the bottom of construction professionals, earning, on average pounds 26,000pa - hardly a "hefty" salary after a minimum of seven years' training.

I estimate my hourly rate this year to be in the vicinity of 50p. I have given up too many evenings and weekends not just to make ends meet but to provide a service which fulfils my clients' expectations and perhaps has some positive impact on their home or place of work.

Maggie Mullan

Liverpool

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in