Letter: Mistaken Act
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.When Alan Watkins writes about the Parliament Act of 1911, saying that if not previously dissolved a parliament ceases to exist five years from the day first appointed, he is actually quoting from the Act that governs the length of a parliament, which is not the 1911 Parliament Act ("Bankruptcy and death could soon do for Mr Major", 5 May).
The Parliament Act of 1911 is more famous for curtailing the powers of the House of Lords on Money Bills. It also in Section 7 amended the Septennial Act 1715, which sets the life of a parliament, to become five years instead of the seven years then operating.
Quoting the 1911 Act might give the false impression that our election laws are modern in that they are from this century.
The position is somewhat worse than this example. The current legislation setting the age limit for a parliamentary candidate at one-and-twenty years is the Parliamentary Elections Act 1695 under a sole clause quaintly titled "Infants shall not be elected". It is not to the credit of Parliament that we allowed this situation to arise, but then our parliament never debates our constitution for fear the public might find out about it.
Jeff Rooker MP
House of Commons
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments