Letter: Minor surgery, major scars

Dr John Warren
Saturday 28 May 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

JOHN MORRISH'S report 'Mother wins injury award for son's circumcision' (22 May) about the boy circumcised at 18 months for no medical indication, without anaesthesia, and without his mother's consent, highlights an important issue. Should parents have any right to alter surgically a child's genitalia when there is no abnormality present? While female genital mutilation is illegal in this country, surgery on males remains legal, even though there is mounting evidence that circumcision is traumatic at the time, and males are harmed throughout their lives by the loss of the foreskin.

The foreskin is richly supplied with specialised nerve endings and is a major source of pleasure during sexual arousal. Furthermore it protects the glans, which when left exposed, gradually loses its sensitivity. The circumcised man also suffers mechanical sexual problems because he is often left with insufficient skin on his penis to allow the natural gliding motion of the skin over the shaft and glans during sex.

Thus there is permanent physical damage. In addition, many men are psychologically affected by this mutilation. They feel incomplete, and they often feel betrayed by their parents and the medical profession. Restoration of the foreskin is possible by non-surgical means now, though it takes months or years. Many circumcised men feel driven to this course of action. It is time the general public and the medical profession recognised the serious effects of this apparently trivial surgery.

Dr John Warren

Consultant Physician

Harlow, Essex

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in