Letter: Ivory towers for women, too

Heon Stevenson
Sunday 16 February 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Cambridge University's students' union should be careful when complaining that the supervision system militates against women students by rewarding the supposedly male qualities of confidence and assertiveness ("Cambridge students dispel myth of university's academic excellence", 9 February). Should the university reward timidity, deference and halting indecision? Only, I suggest, if market research reveals that those are the qualities that people go to Cambridge to develop.

Small-group teaching nurtures self-confidence by teaching men and women how to think for themselves, rather than how to become convincing compendia of others' ideas and prejudices. In one-to-one supervision, a student can test out ideas without inviting the derision of Henry-the-swot. Lasting self-confidence comes from intellectual competence, an agile and well- stocked mind and a relish for knowledge, which is fuelled by genuine curiosity about the world rather than by an introverted, solipsistic quest for "achievement". An "easy on the ladies" approach (call it positive discrimination or what you will) will not nurture that self-confidence. How could it, when its beneficiaries would suspect they had been indulged as their male equals were not?

Heon Stevenson

London N8

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in