LETTER: Happy at the hole in the wall

Richard Tyson-Davies
Saturday 08 April 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE article "Lax banks blamed for vanishing cash" (Business, 2 April) offers an unbalanced view of the secure and reliable cash services offered by banks and building societies in this country. More than 3.5 million customers withdraw £150m in cash every single day, yet only one of those customers had reason to complain to either the Banking Ombudsman or the Building Societies Ombudsman.

Moreover, contrary to the claim in the article, complaints about cash machines are actually falling.

A bank or building society may challenge a customer who disputes a transaction because experience has shown that many customers genuinely forget a transaction or the customer's card is borrowed by a family member or workmate. The increasing numbers of cameras linked to cash machines have starkly confirmed this.

To suggest that the law in the UK is "weighted against customers who complain about phantom transactions" is total rubbish. The Code of Banking Practice specifically states that in a dispute the card issuer will bear the full losses incurred unless the customer acted with fraud or gross negligence.

Richard Tyson-Davies

Association for Payment Clearing Services

London EC2

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in