Letter: Gay survey results cannot be accurate while stigma remains
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WITHOUT wishing to cast aspersions on those who conducted the survey into homosexuality in Britain (Review, 23 January), their findings should be treated sceptically.
Not surprisingly, the authors report that respondents admitted to more homosexual experience in their written replies than they had during face- to-face interviews. Yet why should even these written replies be regarded as accurate? It really is nave to expect most people to be willing to commit to paper their true feelings and activities in this area when the personal consequences of doing so are potentially so damaging.
The truth is that the vast majority of gay people in Britain would risk losing their friends, family and employment if their sexuality were publicly known. Sealed replies could only be identified by number, but everyone knows that no scheme is flawless. While there is any risk whatsoever that such information might fall into the wrong hands, the incentive to lie will be enormous.
Not until society treats gay people as equals can the results of such a survey be regarded as accurate.
Dr Stephen Pullinger
London WC2
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments