Letter: Gas investment pay-offs

David Loverseed
Sunday 04 December 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

WHATEVER might be the merits of his other arguments against privatisation of railways, Ralph Gee (Letters, 27 November) should not have called in aid the reason ``why all the original gas, light and coke companies were municipalised in the 1890s'', for they were not. None of the original gas companies (London, Preston and Liverpool) were ever municipalised. Some gas undertakings were set up as municipal enterprises. Some gas companies were taken over by local authorities (but very few as late as the 1890s). And some municipal undertakings were taken over by the private sector. On nationalisation in 1949 perhaps 40 per cent of gas undertakings were municipally owned. This was mainly a Midlands and Northern feature; there were very few municipal undertakings in the South - and in London there were none.

Mr Gee also seems to believe that where gas undertakings were municipalised this was out of a desire to better regulate their activities. It was not. While in some cases local authorities later chose to operate for the benefit of customers (ie on a cheap-gas basis), invariably the reason for setting up a gas undertaking, or purchasing the existing company, was to maximise profits for the relief of the rates.

David Loverseed

Woodsmoor, Stockport

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in