Letter: Drug runners
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PETER CORRIGAN implies ('A drug called winning', 3 July) that there has been no scientific attempt to establish if anabolic steroids boost performance. In 1975 the American sports physician Dr A J Ryan reviewed 18 scientific studies and concluded that there was no substantial evidence that anabolic steroids improved performance. Despite this conclusion, well-publicised in the United States, the abuse of steroids in sport there increased.
It is nave to imagine that any study would convince athletes that steroids are not effective. They might conclude that the dose used was too small. Anabolic steroids, when used in large doses, are strongly linked to liver cancer. Very large doses - up to 400mg/day - are used in sport, this is more than 10 times the maximum dose normally used therapeutically. The administration of large doses to healthy subjects for a medical trial would be unethical.
Ray Brooks
Retired Professor of Chemical Endocrinology
London SW12
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments