Letter: Deaf need more than pounds 33 a week
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The House of Lords' decision in the case of Rebecca Halliday ("Woman deaf since birth wins new deal for disabled", 22 May) is important for its recognition of the communication needs of deaf people. However, its effect in extending opportunity and choice for deaf people will be largely symbolic. In practical terms, an allowance of pounds 33 per week would purchase two hours of interpreting.
This judgment will not resolve the fundamental problem of the shortage of registered qualified sign-language interpreters - there are fewer than 100 in the UK - or the lack of funding for training more of them.
STEWART SIMPSON
Chief Executive
Council for the Advancement of Communication with Deaf People
Durham
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments