LETTER : Black American sounds better than English
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I object to John Carlin's description of Ebonics as a "term employed to dignify the grammatically anarchic English spoken by rebellious black American youths" ("x plus y = PC insanity", 25 May). You don't have to like the name or believe the subject should be taught in schools to accept that black Americans speak differently from white Americans: you just have to listen. This differs in no significant way from the fact that people in Penzance speak differently from those in Glasgow.
Nor is it fair to describe black American as "anarchic". Like all dialects and languages, Ebonics has its own consistent system of grammatical and phonetic rules. It has some stereotypical features which strike British ears as slovenly or incorrect - its supposed tendency to drop the final "g" in words like "runnin'", its use of "d" for "th" in words like "that"; but these cannot properly be described as inherently wrong.
Indeed to my Canadian ear, they often sound a lot better than some of the worst annoyances of British English: your odd difficulties with "r" in words like "arm" (where it ought to be) and "law" in "law and order" (where it ought not); and your archaic use of "whilst" instead of "while" are two of the more irritating.
Daniel Paul O'Donnell
York
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments