Letter: An English fit only for elites
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.All credit to John Honey for advocating the social desirability of Standard English. His proposal, however, for a National Language Authority would, if established, cause more problems than it would solve.
The reason for the "anything goes" approach to English in many schools was (unwarranted) suspicion of Standard English as a means of class oppression. Such suspicion would be fed by a National Language Authority, which would be regarded by many as an Orwellian, authoritarian apparatus.
Today there are many cultural argots and regional dialects in Britain. They reflect the experiences and interests of their speakers. The greater the diversity of these locutions, the greater the need for a single universal code that all can use with precision. Such a code needs to be monitored and revised by a body more demotic than the elite practitioners suggested by Professor Honey.
Gary Slapper
The Open University
Milton Keynes
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments