LETTER : Aid that goes to the wealthy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.RICHARD Dowden and Stephen Castle say that "Britain can still be proud" that 70 per cent of UK bilateral aid goes to "the poorest group" ("Who are we in the world?", 26 March). On whose analysis is this figure based? Could it be the Overseas Development Administration's, which is interested in maintaining public support by presenting aid as going to the truly poor?
If so, it should be pointed out that the "poorest group" referred to is of countries and not of people. Britain's aid tends to benefit Western companies and wealthy lites in poor countries whose greed and economic mismanagement have allowed these countries to be mired in poverty in the first place.
Melissa Tucker
Brighton
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments