Yes, Keir Starmer is a bit wooden, but at least when he opens his mouth he has something thoughtful to say
Please send your letters to letters@independent.co.uk
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I agree with Sean O’Grady that Sir Keir Starmer is a bit “wooden”, but on the plus side he only opens his mouth when he has something to say, unlike other MPs.
And when he does speak there seems to be an air of considered thought that has gone into his utterances. One trait that really impresses me is that he doesn’t try to score points on personal issues and instead plays a line out to extract the facts.
Sir Keir has only been leader of Labour for a few months and surely he needs a while longer to warm to the job of keeping the Conservative government on its toes. His predecessor Jeremy Corbyn was a much less convincing protagonist, failing to make dent in the Tory armour. If Sir Keir can sort out the inner conflicts of the Labour Party then I believe he has a winning chance at the next election.
You never know, I might even vote for him – if he has a manifesto that excites me.
Keith Poole
Basingstoke
Lacking leadership
I read the article from Vincent Wood about Boris Johnson's meeting with the influential 1922 committee of somewhat rancorous and rebellious backbenchers and of course the necessary jests had to be uttered by the prime minister to facilitate a reasonable discussion. Excuse me, why should these be necessary when dire facts of this Covid-19 crisis are staring Conservative MPs from every constituency in the face.
Merry self-demeaning quips to jolly his troops is well beneath the position of prime minister and to dismiss Theresa May's suggestion that businesses should be involved, out of hand, by yet another put down is not helpful, pragmatic or sensible.
I appreciate that Johnson has taken the seriousness of the situation on board because this king of the libertarians must indeed shake in his shoes at the draconian restrictions being implemented, as it goes against every fibre in his body. So if that is the case, stop trying to placate the rebels, show leadership and, if they don't like it, cut short the meeting and Zoom out.
Judith A Daniels
Great Yarmouth, Norfolk
Down under deal
The government is on the right track in calling a no deal with the EU an “Australian deal”. But, given this may result in companies trading with the EU failing to keep afloat, shouldn’t it instead be called a “Down under deal”?
Roger Hinds
Surrey
Time for unity
I recently heard a gentleman who was exempt from wearing a mask call into a radio programme and discuss how he suffered the glare of the public on buses as a consequence of being mask-less. Such glares are, sadly, not news to Muslim women. We have suffered these throughout our lives here in the UK for going about our business whilst wearing a hijab. Yet today, when society now sees face coverings as something protective, this gentleman is having to suffer the same fate. What does this tell us about society?
We are witness to damning and sweeping judgements of society increasing by the day. Without knowledge, investigation, or indeed understanding of others, we are quick to judge and cast aside those who may differ from what we perceive to be the norm. While it may be the easier option, it certainly is not the way forward.
As the founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, has stated, one should "love mankind to such a degree that you consider the suffering and the trials and tribulations of others as your own”. Indeed, these troubled times should be a means of our reflection and encourage us to stand non-judgmentally, shoulder to shoulder in unity, albeit with our two-metre social distance.
Maleeha Mansur
London
Cummings control
The government appears to be rudderless, flailing, adrift. Perhaps Dominic Cummings has lost interest in all things coronavirus (so last season), focussing on long-term, lofty, cyber-type projects from his new control centre instead?
Debbie Stamper
Epsom
Rebalancing the economy
The pandemic is forcing us rather brutally to rebalance our economy away from wealth consumption and towards wealth creation, ie towards the creation of goods and services which can be traded internationally. You can’t export a haircut or a good night out, and a shake-out of jobs in the personal services and hospitality sectors is inevitable.
There needs therefore to be investment in training for more productive activities which have employment opportunities that will help to repay the huge national debt currently being incurred. It would have been easier to start this 40 years ago when we had the cushion of income from North Sea oil and gas. Sadly, this bonus was squandered and now we have to manage the restructure the hard way, starting by recognising that we cannot expect to return to the pre-pandemic conditions.
John Wilkin
Bury St Edmunds
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments