Exploitation-free carpet buying
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Adam Robertson
Sir: You reported (3 May) that major European importers had scrapped orders for hand-knotted carpets from Pakistan.
The tragic death of Iqbal Masih has created unprecedented media coverage for the issue of child slavery and has rightly mobilised public opinion against those who exploit children in the carpet industry. It is however, extremely important that Pakistan is not made a scapegoat for a problem that affects the whole of South Asia and wider. Scrapping orders for carpets from Pakistan allows European importers to allay the immediate fears of their customers, but switching their operations to carpet producers elsewhere in the region ultimately solves nothing.
Instead of depriving the Pakistani economy of another $10m it can ill afford, European partners should instead insist on an independently monitored guarantee that the carpets they do buy are not produced by illegal child labour. Such a regional initiative has been developed by the South Asian Coalition on Children in Servitude. It is called the "Rugmark" and the first carpets bearing this guarantee arrived in Germany last January.
Western buyers should take responsibility for the goods they sell. If they are serious about improving the plight of children like Iqbal, why are they not supporting the "Rugmark" scheme? It is up to us, the consumers, to make sure they do.
Yours sincerely,
ADAM ROBERTSON
Anti-Slavery International
London, SW9
4 May
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments