EU's secret minutes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Nigel Haigh
Sir: Your story "EU faces legal storm over backroom deals" (23 June) should at last bring the issue of secret Council minutes into prominence. Anyone who closely studies the implementation of EU directives becomes aware that unpublished Council minutes have been used to alter their intended meaning.
The Institute for European Environmental Policy first came across this in the early 1980s, and drew it to the attention of the European Parliament, which took it up and passed a resolution (Official Journal C172, 2 July 1984.) This called for explanatory declarations recorded in Council minutes to be published together with the relevant directive or regulation. The existence of this resolution is noted in Manual of Environmental Policy: the EC and Britain, which is used by practitioners dealing with EU environmental legislation. The manual gives examples of the practice.
Obviously member states and the Commission must be free to express views on legislation as it goes through the Council and these should be recorded in the minutes, but where recorded statements have the effect of altering the interpretation of legislation, then these statements must be made public.
Yours faithfully,
Nigel Haigh
Director
Institute for European
Environmental Policy
London, SW1
23 June
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments