Domestic violence
Anita Roddick's remarks are phrased exclusively in terms of men-on-women violence
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Anita Roddick apparently believes that, in a just cause, any amount of spin is justified ("None of us can afford to ignore domestic violence", 19 September).
I agree her cause is just, but all the emotive remarks that she makes are phrased exclusively in terms of men-on-women violence. Yet she deploys the statistic that four out of ten people say that they have witnessed a "person" being "verbally or physically abused by their partner in a social situation." By what criteria of independence did you examine her claims that one in nine women in the UK are severely beaten each year? When she says that one in four women are abused in their lifetime, is she still referring to being severely beaten or are we now including all verbal abuse? Spicing up a case with figures from battered women's groups paints a picture of millions of guilty men.
Using a 1999 Home Office self-completion questionnaire, 4.2 per cent of women and 4.2 per cent of men reported some form of assault from their partner in a year. Those that caused any injury, even slight, were reported by 2.2 per cent of women and 1.1 per cent of men. The more severe cases have a heavier male-inflicted bias, but they are much rarer still. So Ms Roddick's one in nine women each year receiving severe injuries is untrue.
The violence she campaigns about is appalling but the attitude, in reporting it, of "my sex, right or wrong", causes real damage. In family courts, any accusation of domestic violence, however mutual, unsubstantiated or opportunistically timed, warrants a separating mother indefinite peace. I invite Ms Roddick to join me in my voluntary work with Families Need Fathers for the thousands of children legally kept incommunicado from all their paternal relatives, male or female.
ROGER MACY
Tunbridge Wells, Kent
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments