Matt Hancock’s reckless daily testing target may yet come back to bite him

Send your letters to letters@independent.co.uk

Saturday 02 May 2020 21:39 BST
Comments
100,000 daily UK coronavirus tests target has been met and exceeded

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Questions have quite rightly been asked about Matt Hancock’s arithmetic, as he claimed to have met his promise that 100,000 tests would be carried out daily by the end of April. Weirdly, by hook or by crook, and there are many valid reasons to doubt the legitimacy of his claim that target was met.

But, his reckless promise may yet come back to bite Mr Hancock in the bottom. He said “daily”. Not just on a single day in April. Not just the last day in April. So, it’s going to be a busy May.

Beryl Wall
London

Testing conundrum

We know that some people can be infected with Covid-19 but have minor symptoms or none, and that they can infect others. In order to know how many such individuals there are in the community, there would have to be, and to have been, regular sample testing. Otherwise, any estimate of the R number, of how many are infected by one individual, has to be a guess, doesn’t it?

Susan Alexander
Frampton Cotterell

Food banks are not a solution

It came as no surprise to learn that the use of food banks by children has more than doubled since the onset of Covid-19 obliged the UK government to impose a nationwide lockdown. That such a network of charitable aid might have arisen as a consequence of the pandemic could be seen as a normal and indeed laudable reaction to the extreme challenge this disease presents, but what is difficult to accept is that food banks existed at all prior to this national crisis.

One cannot escape the irony in the truth that such charitable initiatives have been looked upon by successive Tory governments as a solution to poverty rather than a damning indictment of their indifference towards tackling the issue.

Jerry Wells
Alresford

Public toilets for the elderly

I would like to thank Janet Street-Porter for her article supporting the over-70s. I would like to mention that, in its future plans to bring us out of lockdown, I hope the government and local authorities consider the population’s need to use public toilets and put more in place.

If we haven’t got cafes, pubs and other public buildings open where do we go? Just how far can we walk? How many stations and parks have these facilities? And thought needs to be given to their upkeep. I feel this is not a new subject, but one that is essential now.

Pat Hetherington
Birmingham

No ageism please

A great article from Janet Street-Porter, but mandatory passports for those over 70? It’s that arbitrary number of 70 again, and an impossible overload for surgeries. No ageism please.

Mike Richardson
New Malden

Keep Covid-19 facilities for homeless

Once the Covid-19 crisis is over, could it be put to the government and the people to consider not dismantling the facilities now being provided, at least temporarily.

Instead put them to use to help the homeless. Providing shelter, medical care and counselling for these vulnerable people would be a huge step forward for our society.

It would also provide jobs. We could choose to voluntarily put £1 into a fund, maybe on a monthly basis, to meet costs.

Ruth Lucchini
Whitstable

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in