The national outrage over the Channel migrant crossings is bizarre
Please send your letters to letters@independent.co.uk
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.While I agree that the migrant issue points to flaws in the UK’s national security and raises the question as to why our defence and security is geared towards prominent, international operations rather than our own defence, I would also point out that I feel this “major incident” is being exaggerated.
It is not to be ignored that immigration to the UK can have major socioeconomic benefits, and even if it didn’t, is 200 or so immigrants over the past 2 months really a cause for national outrage?
Faye Blenkin
Address supplied
Our esteemed home secretary asserts that the wretched folk arriving in rubber boats across the Channel may not be asylum seekers.
Maybe not. But what motivates them? Possibly they seek a better life through work and education, after all they seem to have had enough cash to kick this dream off.
Is this dream so different from the dream that brought our esteemed home secretary’s family from the Indian subcontinent to our shores?
The horrid expression, “Pull the ladder up, I’m OK”, springs to mind.
Tim Brook
Bristol
Break it up, you two
It’s a little childish of me, I know, and not at all classy, but may I say to both Gavin Williamson and Sajid Javid as they squabble over their boats, budgets and bloody egos: “Go away and shut up”.
Beryl Wall
London, W4
A bad Brexit choice
Have you noticed how the political “debate” surrounding the sludge of Brexit has segued to one about deal or no deal? That is because even the hideous Gove finds he can sound firm and concerned and statesmanlike throwing out statements about how a no deal is “not an option”.
It’s as if we’ve been hustled down a dirty alley by thugs. We are so dazed and confused that instead of thinking how we can get out of the alley we are now happy to consider whether we want our kneecaps shot off or our heads smashed in…
Amanda Baker
Edinburgh
We need to reduce meat consumption
Caroline Lucas is right to highlight the issue of a meat tax. Livestock production is a significant contributor to climate change. You don’t have to be a hard vegan to make a difference by cutting meat consumption. With the future of the planet at risk, there are some tough choices to be made.
Chris Davey
Northampton
Respect the (second) referendum result
I am tired of people saying “How many referendums do you need before you get the answer you want?” Yes, I voted Remain, and yes, I would like a second referendum.
But aside from the fact that it seems the only way to unblock the present impasse, I feel confident that most Remain supporters would, sadly, respect a repeat of the 2016 outcome, and would not ask for a third referendum.
Of course that’s quite a different matter, if we do leave, to a future general election where rejoining is a campaign issue.
Patrick Cosgrove
Bucknell
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments