Cannabis: addiction, public policy, metaphysics
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.rom Mr Colin Brewer
Sir: Your correspondent David Partington (Letters, 8 March) says that "The last thing we need is another intoxicating substance unleashed on society". As someone who treats both alcoholism and illicit drug abuse, I have sometimes said to alcoholic patients that if they cannot stop drinking, they should seriously consider changing to a less damaging recreational drug such as cannabis or even heroin.
Alcohol remains our main problem drug and is directly responsible for a large amount of violent crime. In general, this is not true of heroin or cannabis. The Victorians were right to observe that "There is more violence in a pint of whisky than in a pound of opium".
Many regular cannabis users drink little or no alcohol and the same is true of many heroin addicts. For them, their drug of dependence - however undesirable that dependence may be - is at least an alternative to alcohol and not an addition.
Until the Americans imposed prohibition on a largely reluctant world around the time of the First World War, the attitude of most governments was that if people wished to amuse, intoxicate, or even destroy themselves with drugs, it was not the government's business to intervene. The country did not fall apart in consequence and while I don't advocate complete laissez-faire in these matters, I do wish that somebody would found a Society for the Restoration of Victorian values in Drug Taking.
Yours etc,
COLIN BREWER
Medical Director
The Stapleford Centre
London, SW1
8 March
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments