LETTERS: Why common sense and Qwerty prevail
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr John Faulls Sir: Christopher Latham Sholes did not design the Qwerty keyboard on the first Remington typewriter simply to slow the typist down ("Mavis just didn't have the touch", 16 January). He designed it so that the typebars carrying letters used in commonly used words would not lie alongside one another.
If typebars carrying t-h-e or a-n-d had been next to each other, the bars would have clashed much more frequently. It is true that fresh keyboard layouts have been proposed which could be operated faster, but they could not be operated by touch typists who had already learnt to type on the existing keyboard and that is why they have never been adopted.
Yours faithfully, JOHN FAULLS Portsmouth, Hampshire 16 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments