LETTERS: Who needs a nation when we have a global economy? Local and global forces are stronger than national ones
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I BELIEVE Neal Ascherson's reflection on the Quebec referendum that "The age of big states is over, and the time of small nations and self-managing regions is upon us" is flawed ("Whatever happens to Quebec, the Tories will learn the wrong lesson", 29 October).
He pours scorn on those Conservatives who want the UK to leave the European Union. But what is the EU if not a very big state in the making? - it aspires to its own currency and defence forces; it already has its own parliament and passport. Yet the prospect that Mr Ascherson promotes is a world of "small nations and self-managing regions" which are happily joined to the global economy. But if this is the case, why bother with any form of political association beyond these basic political units when the global economy will, apparently, perform such co-ordination as is needed?
The irony is that Mr Ascherson's views are not so far from those of the Conservative cave-dwellers he so despises. They also want to join the global economy, Hong Kong-style, but they give precedence to the larger British nation, rather than a small Scottish one. Both sides are trapped in a nationalist discourse arguing essentially about the merits of "size". In the emerging age, for economic and technological reasons, the global, continental and local will be as or more important than the national (whether large or small).
Simon Partridge
London N2
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments