Letters: Unliberated gays
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Kathy Marks cannot be allowed to claim (Features, 11 November) that "after three decades of campaigning, many of the [lesbian and gay] legal battles have been won and remaining inequalities look set to be tackled by the Labour government".
Those three decades have brought nothing but failure on the legal front. In England in 1967 there was a higher age of consent for gay men. If a man and a woman had sex in public, the charge was "indecency", if two men, "gross indecency". If three people (male and female) had sex together, it was a party. If three gay men had sex together it was a criminal offence.
It was not "unfair dismissal" to sack someone for being gay. Homosexual partners had no visiting rights in hospitals and no rights to inherit on an intestate death; nor could they contract a civil partnership contract the way heterosexuals could.
What has changed? The armed forces law has been relaxed. A gay soldier is now "merely" sacked without compensation; he is no longer imprisoned as well. But the Tories made it illegal for local councils to fund gay activities and censorship of gay publications is stricter now than 20 years ago.
What will Labour do about any of this? On the important civil liberties issue of the age of consent, it plans to allow a free vote. It refuses to touch the criminal prohibition, for example, on three people having sex.
We have never been had so good.
Michael Mason
London SW7
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments