Letters: The RUF needs real surrender options

Paul Richards
Sunday 31 January 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

ALEX DUVAL SMITH in Sierra Leone claims that Nigerian peace-keeping forces are summarily executing captured fighters from the Revolutionary United Front ("Why our man in Freetown flies the flag for freedom", 24 January). "[They] make no secret of the fact that they... take no prisoners. There are executions every day."

This follows a pattern first established by national forces in the early days of the war (in 1991). Lack of genuine surrender options later undermined the peace process (in 1996). Threat of summary execution locks the rank and file of the RUF (many of whom are young teenage abductees) in an unremitting struggle. RUF fighters can survive indefinitely in the bush. There they attract the support of international business opportunists interested in Sierra Leone's rich reserves of kimberlite diamonds.

The key to ending the war remains genuine and believable surrender options for the RUF rank and file. If Alex Duval Smith's report is correct then summary execution by peace-keepers is the ethical issue on which Robin Cook should dig in his heels.

PAUL RICHARDS

University College London

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in