Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In your fashionable defence of Quentin Tarantino (leading article, 1 February) you suggest his films bring cartoon violence "to a realistic landscape". But it is surely the simplicity of the landscape that constitutes the major weakness of his films. Too often the environment depicted in Tarantino's movies merely reflects the empty-headed imagination of the figures he portrays; a world derived from second-rate, poorly observed films. In this respect, they differ from the best of the violent films of the 1970s.
Cinema at its best broadens and deepens our awareness of seemingly banal landscapes. Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction are both impressive films.
Yet Tarantino restricts the landscape of cinema to the world of the exploitative video. I can't help feeling (though I belong to that fabled 18-25 age group) that he thereby undermines the value of film.
Yours sincerely, N. Joicey Cambridge 3 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments