Letters:Statistics: unemployment, crime, graphs and independent schools
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I refer to today's front-page article "Statistics chief says jobs count is not believed" (19 December). Bill McLennan, head of the Government Statistical Service, will be glad to hear that he has support from no less an authority than the Chancell or of the Exchequer. In on-the-record, but largely unreported, oral evidence to the Treasury Select Committee, on 14 December, Kenneth Clark said that he preferred the Labour Force Survey, recommended by the International Labour Organisation, to the bene fit claimant count as a measure of unemployment.
As your graph sets out, the two measures of unemployment are seldom far from each other, but show significant short-term differences. According to chart 3.17 in the Budget "red book", the benefit claimant count is at present about 100,000 lower than the Labour Force Survey measure, and close to 2.5 million.
The main reason against the benefit claimant count is that it gives governments an incentive to massage the unemployment figures downwards by denying benefit to more claimants. Mr Clarke's chosen measure is more objective. Just at present, it also has the merit, from his point of view, of suggesting that the economy is still some way from over-heating and thus less in need of a further rise in interest rates.
Yours etc, CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON London, N6
19 December The writer is author of `Measuring the Economy'.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments