LETTERS: Management training could only be good for Labour
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ALAN Watkins is ill-informed. Management is perhaps the social science that stands most clearly at the interface of theory and practice and any management training of value will recommend reading and reflection, although games can form a useful part of the curriculum. The kind of reading Mr Watkins recommends could, of course, provide useful texts for management study.
I would add Nigel Lawson's account of the Thatcher cabinet as an example of how not to manage a top team and as a failure of leadership. But one should be careful of privileging reading as the primary learning activity. To emphasise the written word at the expense of speech is very short- sighted. Surely what we all need, politicians perhaps most of all, is to improve the quality of dialogue. One would hope a good management training course would provide such an opportunity. I wish the Shadow Cabinet well at Templeton.
Professor Ken Starkey
The University of Nottingham
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments