Letters: London has too many answers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Discussion of London's government is producing widely diverging views. Some want a lean and mean executive body with limited "strategic" functions set above the boroughs. Some want an authority for south-east England. An elected mayor is mentioned - a governor even. Others want to scrap the boroughs and restore "local" councils.
Arguing for a fresh start, Andreas Whittam Smith ("Power to the People of London town", 15 July) sees movement for a better London making progress. But is the central issue one of international image, civic pride, powers, policies and practice, resources, or what? Apparently no one wants another GLC, but everyone wants an elected London authority - whose tasks seem to lengthen as the debate grows.
While integrating transport with land use is often seen as the key issue, it can be argued that London's dominant problems are its schools and its health service. In trying to improve London we have to start from the fact that most salient issues are inextricably matters as much for central government as for the boroughs. We have to recognise that London is a unique metropolis - and find a way forward that is not borrowed from somewhere else, but accents central-local co-operation. This would involve change in neither boundaries nor functions.
GRAHAM M LOMAS
Purley, Surrey
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments