Letters: Limit reductionism, not science
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE MILLENNIUM has arrived when two Fellows from opposite poles of the Royal Society squabble in public (Letters, 24 January)! The malign fiction that a seamless garment covers both physics and biology has inhibited for centuries the full exploration of reality.
Of course, Brian Josephson, a Nobel laureate in physics, commands greater credence than Lewis Wolpert ("Under the microscope", 17 January). But it was a pity that Professor Josephson chose to attack the second rather than the first of the topics on which the craftily disingenuous Professor Wolpert said he "would like help". While we would all appreciate guidance from physicists on the "limits to reductionism", the truth is that Wolpert will never accept that it has any.
DH TOMPSETT
Henley on Thames, Oxon
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments