LETTERS: Lay and clerical discord over Pugin window

Dr Thomas Cocke
Monday 31 July 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Dr Thomas Cocke

Sir: I can understand James Fenton's stout defence of the Pugin west window at Sherborne Abbey in his article on 24 July ("Old, faded - but no, vicar, not thrown away"). However, I cannot see how he can turn the failure of his viewpoint to win approval at the consistory court into a resounding attack on the system itself.

The Council for the Care of Churches, the central committee of the Church of England on such matters, had come round to share Mr Fenton's preference for the Pugin window and gave evidence to that effect at the consistory court. We lost, but only after we had the opportunity to put our views in open court and be cross-examined on them.

The Sherborne case opens up an interesting debate between the conservation of past glories and the encouragement of new art and iconography, a debate which is dismissed in a few words. Mr Fenton also dismisses the views of the parish as without significance and seems to prefer some "national control" that will impose its will and presumably Mr Fenton's views on owners without right of redress. Many people might prefer the consistory court as a fairer alternative.

Yours faithfully,

Thomas Cocke

Secretary

Council for the Care of Churches

London, SW1

27 July

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in