LETTERS: Human rights, British politicians and the European Court
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Donald Cape
Sir: From the 1950s, acceptance of the European Convention on Human Rights has been regarded as necessary to qualify for membership of the Council of Europe, whose statute Britain helped to draft. In recent years acceptance of the jurisdiction of the court and of the right of individual petition has been required of would-be new members, such as the formerly Communist countries of Eastern Europe.
To withdraw now would be to proclaim to the world that Britain, alone of all the countries of Europe (including Turkey), is unwilling to offer "all persons within its jurisdiction" an international guarantee of "their human rights and fundamental freedoms".
Is this what Bill Cash, MP, (Another View, 29 September) really wants?
Yours faithfully,
Donald Cape
Guildford, Surrey
30 September
The writer was the UK Permanent Representative to the Council of Europe, 1978-83.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments