LETTERS: How to understand referendum issues
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr John Tippler Sir: Margo MacDonald ("Let the referendum bandwagon roll", 16 January) says that "to have options understood and debated by as many people as possible is the best way". Who could disagree, in principle? But how would she achieve the "understood" past?
I was in Sweden during the recent campaign and referendum on joining the EU. The political debate was on a much higher and more serious level than we are used to in the UK and the people were anxious to make a wise choice. In spite of that, many intelligent people - right up to voting time - felt that they had too little understanding of facts to make their decisions on the basis they would have wished.
When facts are not easy to expose and evaluate, beguiling persuasion takes over. If this is so in Sweden, how much more so in the UK. How would Margo MacDonald deal with that problem?
Yours faithfully, JOHN TIPPLER Stockholm, Sweden
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments