LETTERS : Don't write off the terminally ill

Jean Gaffin
Wednesday 04 January 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Ms Jean Gaffin Sir: You report Professor Sir David Weatherall's concern that people who are terminally ill should receive appropriate care (" `Unkind' doctors given bitter pill", 23 December).

It was this concern that led Dame Cicely Saunders to open St Christopher's Hospice just over 25 years ago and now fuels the growth of the modern hospice movement.

Specialist palliative care services include in-patient beds, day-care and home-care. Through a wide range of educational initiatives, these services, whether based in the National Health Service or the voluntary sector, are spreading the palliative-care

approach to doctors and nurses working in primary care, hospital and nursing home settings.

The Hospice Information Service estimate that almost two-thirds of patients dying of cancer are seen by home-care nurses and that in 1991 28,000 of the 160,000 cancer deaths occurred in hospices.

Through fund raising and volunteering, a generous public provides more than £100m per annum to support the voluntary services.

But if we are all to have the quality of care that Sir David calls for, more resources will be needed. Then we might be seen to be valuing all patients and giving priority to quality of life issues rather than, as too often now, writing off those who no longer benefit from active treatment.

Yours faithfully, Jean Gaffin Executive Director National Council for Hospice and Specialist Palliative Care Services London, W1

30 December

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in