Letters: Chartist answer

John R. Catch
Wednesday 10 July 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Serious independent political thinkers might re-examine the likely consequences of adopting the only one of the Chartists' "Five Points" which has not been accepted long since - annual parliamentary elections.

Annual elections would destroy party politics of the kind we seem to take for granted and profoundly alter the way the country is governed. They could conceivably give us more truly representative government than (for example) occasional referendums. The Chartists foresaw the future on their other points, including the secret ballot and salaries for MPs. Perhaps we should now dust off the final one.

JOHN R CATCH

Great Missenden, Buckinghamshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in