LETTERS: Africa fights on to save elephants from poachers

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: In your article "Japan adds its voice to scrapping ivory ban" (2 April), there were a number of misleading points.

Only four countries in Africa oppose the ivory ban. Around 30 countries are in favour of it and, in fact, more have become so since its positive effects began to be felt. To say that Japan "adds its voice" is to imply a growing chorus of dissent, which is far from the truth. Zimbabwe and Namibia have now lost another ally: South Africa has just announced that it will not be applying to have its elephants removed from the protected list, while Zambia left them behind in 1992.

You state that "African officials believe that the ban encourages poaching". Surveys undertaken in the past three years show huge support among African officials for the ivory ban, and clear evidence that it has reduced poaching almost everywhere and stopped it altogether in some areas. The grossly outnumbered anti-ban Zimbabwean officials are trying to persuade the world that the ban has not worked.

Your article does, however, make one thing abundantly clear. Official Japanese consumption of ivory prior to the ban stood at around 100 tonnes per year. Now craftsmen are saying that only 160 tonnes remain, which will last another five or six years. Consumption has dropped enormously since the ban.

Susie Watts

Environmental Investigation

Agency

London EC1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in